Woman tries to interview pro-Palestine protesters without speaking to the media liaison.

[u/PlenitudeOpulence]

[u/Aggravating-Host-752]

She is crying for being ignored ? It doesn't take much.

[u/-banned- → u/[deleted]]

Wait what says she supports Israel? There’s no indication of that in the video

[u/[deleted] → u/-banned-]

It can be inferred from the fact that she is agitating the pro Palestine side.

[u/-banned- → u/[deleted]]

She’s not purposefully agitating them in this video, she’s very politely asking to talk to them. Since when is that agitation? Very dangerous to be throwing around baseless accusations like that

[u/ShedSoManyTears4Gaza → u/-banned-]

There is a reason she edited over 2-hours of footage into this very carefully selected piece where we only hear her call herself peaceful, and we still hear the other side say she's an agitator. I'm paraphrasing because I'm not going to watch this again, but even from the question 'I genuinely want to understand why you guys are protesting' it's beyond clear she's trying to gaslight the protestors and they don't want to speak to her because of the other hour and 58 minutes of her being an absolute turd.

[u/[deleted] → u/-banned-]

I mean this with no disrespect intended, but you must not have a very high media intelligence.

Because this video is VERY OBVIOUSLY anti-palestinian propaganda. And the protestors she was bothering could easily tell that as well which is why they refused to engage.

If you were to take a moment to do some googling, you'd see that these protestors have made public statements and spoken with the media plenty already.

The stupid questions like "I just want to understand why you are here" have been answered many times already, for instance.

[u/-banned- → u/[deleted]]

Well ya but that’s her job. She’s in media, she wants to get her own quotes right? Think that makes sense. Idk who this girl is though, just confused why everyone is assuming she’s there to ruffle feathers

[u/[deleted] → u/-banned-]

No one is "assuming," it's clear as day to anyone who understands media and propaganda.

[u/moodylilb → u/-banned-]

Someone shared her Twitter above. If you check it out it’s clear she’s there to ruffle feathers

[u/-banned- → u/moodylilb]

Ya with that context it makes sense, just didn’t understand why people were jumping to that conclusion without the twitter information. It happened to be correct this time but not always

[u/bizarrobazaar → u/-banned-]

Because anyone with an ounce of intelligence can realize what this lady's motives are, without having to see her twitter feed.

[u/ShedSoManyTears4Gaza → u/-banned-]

Because that is the only reason she is there for. Believe me, friend, everyone here is confused why you're assuming her intentions are pure. Everything she did was to ruffle feathers, was unprofessional, and insincere.

From showing up, being rejected by the media liaison because she wasn't credentialed nor unbiased, sneaking around behind the media liaison anyway, acting as if she didn't know why on earth anyone would be protesting, then creating and posting this video trying to paint the Pro-Palestinian protestors as unreasonable bad guys

[u/-banned- → u/ShedSoManyTears4Gaza]

I’m not assuming her intentions are pure either, I’m saying there’s not enough information on the video to know either way. Where did the video say why she was rejected by the media liaison? I didn’t see that part. If she’s trying to make money through media then she’s not gonna walk away after getting turned down by the media liaison. I assume that happens pretty frequently, a bad reporter would quit. A good one would still try to get the scoop. I don’t really see how this is unprofessional or insincere, seems pretty par for the course for reporting. Also, I don’t see her reporting this as if they’re unreasonable bad guys. The whole video is just “they won’t talk to me”, she didn’t say anything else.

[u/ShedSoManyTears4Gaza → u/-banned-]

Where did the video say why she was rejected by the media liaison?

She said it herself in the video. When she was told for the fifth time to go see the media liaison.

The whole video is just “they won’t talk to me”, she didn’t say anything else.

She cried. She said that the protestors were very intimidating. She referred to their lack of engagement as the craziest thing she's ever seen while very much dismissing their right to decline interviews. She discarded all messaging from their signs, flyers, social media, and chanting to present a case where she had no clue why they were protesting, and then claimed they refused to tell her.

If she’s trying to make money through media then she’s not gonna walk away after getting turned down by the media liaison.

I used to work for fansided as a reporter. I covered the Dodgers and Cardinals, as well as the MLB Fan Cave contest. I was issued a press pass (a spiritual experience at Dodger Stadium for me), and from my firsthand experience, you are incorrect about not stopping when you're not admitted. In 2023 I did some stuff for NASCAR and the NASCAR HOF. In my distant past I covered the Westminster Dog Show, and the awards dinner the night before. I also currently have a clergy press pass. No events allow every Tom, Dick, and Harry to show up without credentials, and the participants are told of the process to follow with journalists. The only exception I ever experienced was a confidential source I had who played on the Dodgers, and he only offered to be that so that he could clear up any misconceptions or rumors that swirl about. It was a context dependent situation, and if they didn't have Puig, Kemp, Hanley, Greinke, Crawford, and all the other egos causing conflict in the locker room, I would've never been afforded this exception.

You don't get exceptions because you say so. The fact that there is a media liaison in the first place means that there are rules that must be followed, and this lady tried to operate outside of the rules.

But anyway, I'm pretty sure you're a troll, seeing as how the entire premise of her video was her complaining that everyone kept telling her to go see the media liaison, and you're doing the same insincere "Gee golly I have no idea what's going on" scthick that she did. I won't reply again - this reply wasn't for you, it was for anyone that might read it and not understand that your comment was made out of lack of understanding and a sense of entitlement - so I'll just leave it at that. You have no idea what you're talking about, but you know exactly what you're doing, and you know exactly what she was trying to do.

[u/ShedSoManyTears4Gaza → u/ShedSoManyTears4Gaza]

And a good reporter would never have to ask why a large, organized group of protestors, who are quite literally there to share their message, are protesting, FFS.

Troll fo sho.

[u/DonovanQT → u/-banned-]

She is blonde, if you are a white blonde woman nowadays you automatically a racist, zionist, entitleist, ableist, and a lot more ists type a person. Atleast for the left wing