I was watching HopperoMMA and he put the DDP vs Strickland 2 fight on his "UFC fights that make no sense" video and I had to make this post. Strickland arguably won the first fight against DDP, it was a razor close fight with many people being split on the winner, and you're telling me that's not worthy of a rematch? And instead of an immediate rematch we got adesanya who is coming off a loss fighting DDP for the title? And before you guys says "oh but Strickland is so boring!" DDP vs Strickland 1 wasn't even a boring fight. I don't get why you guys want khamzat, who is unreliable in terms of activity, to get a title shot over Strickland when Strickland when to an extremely controversial and debatable decision with DDP. And I'm not saying khamzat is undeserving, I'm just saying it makes so much more sense to have Strickland get the rematch. You're all just haters

I want to take Chandler but Paddy’s grappling could be a major problem

Original video with audio got taken down

I traveled all the way to Vegas from the east coast by myself(I know sad) to witness UFC 300 from the nosebleeds And had a blast solo

In this scenario Fedor is fighting (and dominating) in the UFC