You wrote a lot without showing a tangible metric that Red Bull was faster than the whole grid. You mentioned Newey as a legend and yet they didn't won when Verstappen had Ricciardo as a team-mate.
Show me a metric, an aerodynamic result, an innovation (a legal one) that no one had on the grid that made their cars faster than the rest. No rush, I can wait.
Oh! I though YOU were going to give a proper response. Guess a monkey CAN send a link through Reddit.
And that link you sent is a written report from Ted Kravitz, a journalist! A man who dedicated his studies in journalism at Exeter! At least send a link from Bernie Collins, jeez!
So I’m confused, you want evidence because stating common knowledge isn’t enough. You get the link showing what everyone knew (Red Bull is dominant) and it’s not what you want. You are the clown demanding evidence when you should be proving Perez is not a garbage driver. But you can only use articles I approve.
Anyone can write an article and say that X car is the fastest because of XYZ. That doesn't prove anything other than someone else's opinion. Here, even I can do it:
The aerodynamic loading on the RB20 was 0,03 m/s faster than rated for the rest of the grid. That means that aerodynamic loading significantly increases speeds on curves with a degree higher than 34,6° thereby increasing its speed on the apex by 6,5 kph.
1
u/TheOvercookedFlyer BWOAHHHHHHH 1d ago
You wrote a lot without showing a tangible metric that Red Bull was faster than the whole grid. You mentioned Newey as a legend and yet they didn't won when Verstappen had Ricciardo as a team-mate.
Show me a metric, an aerodynamic result, an innovation (a legal one) that no one had on the grid that made their cars faster than the rest. No rush, I can wait.