I mean when this ceo is the one who pushed for a new ai systek that cause a 50 percent jump in claim denials id argue the ceo had been responsible for far more deaths. (https://www.fox5ny.com/news/unitedhealthcare-ai-algorithms-deny-claims source btw) yes violence against those who dont cause direct harm as a tool is bad but this ceo can be directly linked to harm of countless americans, he was hurting people and was removed from his place of power by someone who saw this, id argue we as a society need to take a long look at what we allow companies to get away with. Because at the end of the day the ceo broke no technical laws, but i implore you. Find someone who believes he was a good person for what he was responsible for, because lets be honest, in that 50 percent jump people died and he lost no sleep over them or their problems.
If taking a life is murder your ass better be on some photosynthesis bullshit cause the grass you're smoking and all the fruit you eat comes from something that had life.
16
u/Mindless-Ground-6199 17d ago
I don't think what this guy did was wrong , is there anything that could have changed my perspective I am missing??