Can't imagine being a big enough loser to buy a 13 year old game with less content for 50$, especially when the far superior Xbox version has all the content already and it's way cheaper 🤣
I kinda feel sorry for any dumbass that pays for it now taking that into account lmao.
No, but the claim doesn't make much sense since most people don't have both consoles, if you have a PlayStation, buying the Xbox version doesnt make sense.
You’re missing the point. It’s a dig at whoever will spend nearly twice as much for a more subpar product. A better version exist for significantly cheaper and you’d have to be a fool to settle for this.
It’s not though. You’re paying far more for something than it’s been objectively worst. You’d be getting fleeced. It’d be better to not buy it, not taking the most convenient option you can get.
You’d be better if buying a used 360 and an old disc. You’re not going to spending much if any more and the console will have potential for far more use than a teenage port and you’ll essentially be playing the same thing.
As well as it’s an old game. There’s absolutely no reason to rush buying it for this apparent full price that’s hardly a discount from a decade ago.
Yeah Ik game is a decade old to be 50 buck but point is price is still cheap than buying a 80 buck refurbished 360 that potentially have dead light of ring or 200-500 buck for Xbox series with 20-30 buck rdr1 depending if you want undead nightmare or not. Hell if you want better deal, Ps plus do discount every month where you can pick up for 20-40 buck. Even PlayStation sent email 📧 play of the month where you can redeem code for discount so therefore it cheaper than picking up Xbox.
-5
u/[deleted] Aug 08 '23
Can't imagine being a big enough loser to buy a 13 year old game with less content for 50$, especially when the far superior Xbox version has all the content already and it's way cheaper 🤣
I kinda feel sorry for any dumbass that pays for it now taking that into account lmao.