I mean maybe a bit but it was a kind of a dangerous situation and every time you come out of danger you technically avert a disaster. Had he not aborted the landing, it could have been real bad.
That's why it's true. The reason it's misleading is because it implies that there was some reasonable chance that a disaster would have happened. The reality is quite mundane. It is both technically accurate and misleading.
....if the plan to abort the landing wasn't made at the last moment here the tail end of the plane would have slammed into the ground do to that massive gust of wind, it's not like this was a practice landing or something. He was fully committed to landing, the wind changed, he aborted the landing thus avert the accident.
65
u/berni2905 26d ago
You don't "just change your mind" for no reason in situations like these. You go around if the conditions make continuing the landing too dangerous.