A hateful attack on someone is by definition a reason to consider not letting someone participate in society. Are prison systems absolutely fucked up, and can people be wrongly imprisoned for saying something with peaceful intention, YES, but like every means of enforcement it just depends on how the state defines any crime. In Rowling's case I see a rightful reason to consider her speech a hate crime
105
u/Madrugada2010 Aug 23 '24
My guess is that she's going to have to make some kind of public apology, and that's a check her fucking ego won't cash.