The most convincing argument for economic democracy that I've seen actually comes from a classical liberal position. Basically the same argument classical liberals used against slavery. You own your labour, ownership of that is an inalienable right, a right not even you can consent to being taken away (consent is not the issue with slavery, as even consenting into a slave contract is illegal). As it was with slavery, the same is true with the employment contract: it is a fraud, because it pretends to alienate that which is inalienable.
David Ellerman has developed this Labour theory of property quite significantly, into what he called the neo-abolitionist movement.
1
u/MasterDefibrillator Mar 08 '22
The most convincing argument for economic democracy that I've seen actually comes from a classical liberal position. Basically the same argument classical liberals used against slavery. You own your labour, ownership of that is an inalienable right, a right not even you can consent to being taken away (consent is not the issue with slavery, as even consenting into a slave contract is illegal). As it was with slavery, the same is true with the employment contract: it is a fraud, because it pretends to alienate that which is inalienable.
David Ellerman has developed this Labour theory of property quite significantly, into what he called the neo-abolitionist movement.
https://ellerman.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Ellerman-Property-and-Contract-Book.pdf