r/KidsAreFuckingStupid Aug 20 '24

Video/Gif That came off easy.

21.8k Upvotes

828 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

167

u/ChunkySalsaMedium Aug 20 '24

That's not a piece of glass dude. It has no other function than to keep people from touching the real glass.

37

u/Buttcrack_Billy Aug 20 '24

Fuck them rules. I'm putting my hands all over thet glass!

14

u/Dragon_0562 Aug 20 '24 edited Aug 20 '24

enjoy getting them back off. that glass is gonna be about -40c to -50c ( -40 to -58F, for Buttcrack's sake)

32

u/Buttcrack_Billy Aug 20 '24

I'm American. Those units of temperature mean nothing to me.

23

u/rif-was-better Aug 20 '24

Luckily for you, -40° is the same temperature in C and F 🤓

9

u/GoingOutsideSocks Aug 20 '24

I got to do this to a Canadian tourist a decade ago. It's an emotional high I've been chasing since.

4

u/Perryn Aug 20 '24

witchcraft

2

u/Wonderful-Ad-7712 Aug 20 '24

Wait till the kid starts licking it

7

u/EL3G Aug 20 '24

Died lmao 🤣😂😆

1

u/Dragon_0562 Aug 20 '24

So am I, but I got taught metric AND freedom Fractions...

-5

u/Cannot_People Aug 20 '24

You could try Google, mr buttcrack 🫡

-4

u/SuperDuperBonerific Aug 20 '24

And it failed. Now imagine how many tens of thousands of other components are on the verge of failing like that protective cover and enjoy your flight. ✈️

48

u/Direct-Serve-9489 Aug 20 '24

I would not call that failing.

a) It was probably not designed to withstand a suction cup pulling on it.

b) That might actually be the intended way to remove it.

38

u/Single_Blueberry Aug 20 '24

It's b)

It's called a "scratch pane" btw.

3

u/Direct-Serve-9489 Aug 20 '24

Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.

14

u/Daxx22 Aug 20 '24

No! Live in fear! Be ignorant!

8

u/Direct-Serve-9489 Aug 20 '24

Unfortunately, that seems to be the theme for many people these days.

Also, there are people with fear of flying, who would probably be freaked out by this.

-4

u/SuperDuperBonerific Aug 20 '24

So you’re saying there are two diametrically opposed possibilities?

a) it’s not supposed to come off. Hence not designed to withstand a suction cup or… b) it is designed to come off very easily. By a baby.

I’m sure it’s a scratch pane and that it’s meant to be removable. But there’s no way a scratch pane is meant to be pulled off by a passenger let along a baby.

A scratch pane is meant to keep the passenger away from the actual glass

It failed.

https://www.aircraftinteriorsinternational.com/news/airframer-news/aftermarket-scratch-panes-developed-for-boeing-737-sidewalls.html

9

u/worthlessprole Aug 20 '24

the child's toy contains the tool that is meant to remove it. this is like saying a door failed because someone popped the hinges.

5

u/Direct-Serve-9489 Aug 20 '24 edited Aug 20 '24

How is that diametrically opposed?

a) not designed to withstand a suction cup pulling on it -> may come off when pulling on it with a suction cup

b) designed to be pulled off by a suction cup -> should come off when pulling on it with a suction cup

a) is included in b)

It be surprisingly easy to disassemble things, when you happen to have the correct tool. We also do not know for how long the baby has been tugging away at it.

Yes, it is supposed to keep the passengers away from the glass, but it is not safety-relevant, if it does not. It is for thermal insulation and, avoiding having to replace the actual windows due to scratches, dirt, etc. This is immaterial to the question, if it failed or not though. The only relevant question in that regard is, if it was (albeit accidentally) removed the way it was designed to be removed or not A baby being able to remove that part in the intended way points to a potential design flaw, not a bad part.

Edit: According to this post the baby removed the part in the intended way.

7

u/Mikey_MiG Aug 20 '24

That’s not how any of this works. A cosmetic interior piece “failing” is not indicative that any actual important parts of the plane will fail. And the maintenance of even minor components like this is heavily regulated. As soon as the plane lands the pilots will write up it up as a discrepancy, maintenance personnel will come out to look at it, and they’ll either fix it immediately if possible or secure it safely until it can be fixed in the near future.

25

u/legumious Aug 20 '24

It's always depressing when you see in real time that not only do people not have any idea how things work, they react with fear at the thought of trying to understand how things work.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '24

[deleted]

1

u/TheMrBoot Aug 20 '24

For real. There's plenty of reasons to give Boeing shit without making stuff up to be mad about.

21

u/Single_Blueberry Aug 20 '24

It didn't fail, it's removable.

4

u/lafaa123 Aug 20 '24

Planes are by far the safest form of transportation. I'll be fine.

4

u/MedianMahomesValue Aug 20 '24

Its designed to be easily swapped out using a suction cup like this. It is not failing.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '24

Like Jerry with the yellow m&ms

2

u/do-wr-mem Aug 20 '24 edited Aug 20 '24

r/shittyaskflying moment

Why doesn't the pylote realize his planes windows are falling off is he stupid?????????????

E: lmao someone already posted it https://www.reddit.com/r/Shittyaskflying/s/pL8sgdDvny

2

u/rdp3186 Aug 20 '24

To take that particular piece off you use a suction cup tool to remove it. Her toy did the exact same thing that the removal tool would do.

It worked as intended abd came off as intended, just by the wrong person by accident.

Quit spreading bullshit and fear mongering over something trivial

1

u/Charming_Fix5627 Aug 20 '24

Unless that thing was fractured and dented, it did not “fail”. You probably panic when you see a highway overpass with cracks in the concrete or visible repair work being done.

1

u/Ravizrox Aug 20 '24

Happy Cake Day!

1

u/Dorkamundo Aug 20 '24

Known as the "Scratch Pane".

1

u/pursuitofhappy Aug 20 '24

touch it, you mean mush their face into it

0

u/Bruger_McDonalds Aug 20 '24

Happy cake day