r/firefox • u/neblustar • 10h ago
⚕️ Internet Health Mozilla should have abandoned their pact with the devil long long ago and now it is biting them in the ass.
If you have been out of the loop, Google is facing a US DOJ anti-trust lawsuit for monopolistic and anti-competitive practices, specifically regarding their search engine market, which has an actually considerable chance of resulting in Google having to split their business up into different companies, possibly even having to sell off Chrome and Android. Well, at least that was the recommendation of the prosecutor on how to address the issue, it not set in stone what is going to happen yet, but one thing is for certain, Google stands on trial for monopolistic practices and it will take a lot of "lawyer dollars" for them to wiggle their way out of this.
Google appealed the Court's decision but the process requires that first a remedy proposal is submitted by Google for the DOJ's search distribution case. Last Friday, Google presented its remedy proposal, and regarding the search engine deals with Apple and Mozilla, amidst the hyperbolic word salad, Google provided no real solutions other than allowing renegotiating the search engine deals more often and splitting them in multiple default agreements across different platforms (desktop vs mobile). This, of course, does not fulfill in the least the requirements of the prosecutor, and Google is well aware of that, but they just need to come up with something to appeal the decision.
Two days before, a blog post authored by 'Mozilla' addressing the DOJ case stated that:
As written, the proposed remedies will force smaller and independent browsers like Firefox to fundamentally reexamine their entire operating model [...] A key concern centers on proposed contractual remedies put forward by the DOJ that could harm the ability of independent browsers to fund their operations. Such remedies risk inadvertently harming browser and browser engine competition without meaningfully advancing search engine competition [...] We urge the court to consider remedies that achieve its goals without harming independent browsers.
Now, this is really bad. With these words of 'concern', Mozilla is pretty much acknowledging that they are critically dependent on being a tentacle of Google's monopoly through their default search deal money for operation.
Let's get one thing straight. Apple is not dependent on Google's money. And besides, Mozilla is not the only other independent browser in existence, there are others, like Brave or Vivaldi. The recommended remedies put forward by the DOJ do not "harm the ability of independent browsers to fund their operations", as neither Brave or Vivaldi depend on Google's money and are not dependent on the outcome of this lawsuit. It harms Mozilla's ability alone. And that is something that they should have seen coming from very far off.
The web has been under Google's stronghold for a long time. In addition, Google has very questionable privacy breaching policies in their user data handling. Google has been cruising along stacking rolls of money with a monopoly on advertising, search and mobile unpunished for years which goes completely against the open web ideals that Mozilla supposedly upholds, and which ironically have actually contributed to Firefox's market share decline, i.e. Google's own services and the web at large having more compatibility and optimization for Chrome, putting Firefox at clear disadvantage. In that sense, Google's default search deal money could arguably be addressed as mere compensation for dominating the web for themselves rather than a revenue stream. The prosecution demands are more than fair considering the way Google has abused its position. It is really awful to see Mozilla get to this place where they are critically dependent on a negative outcome from a anti-trust case against Google for the very same practices that have actually hurt Firefox as well.
In Mozilla blog post, the words read like a desperate pleading "pls we really need that money, we are activists and we are the only alternative browser engine", when in fact, Mozilla should be rather applauding the DOJ case in standing up for the open web. Notice how the prosecutor mandates that Google Play Services and Google Apps are decoupled from Android and not forcibly pre-installed, which means now phone manufactures can actually decide to ship Firefox as the default mobile browser. Great news, right? But Mozilla is nowhere near as concerned about that, why? Because they really need that search engine money.
Mozilla claims that their "users" had a strong preference for Google and that is why they resumed the search deal with Google, but the reality is that such only cemented Google's monopoly and Mozilla allowed themselves to be used as a tentacle of Google's octopus, since users can change their default search engine to Google in 2 clicks anyway, as Mozilla themselves stated:
Today, Firefox users in the U.S. can choose between Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Amazon, eBay and Wikipedia directly in the address bar. They can easily add other search engines
Mozilla was too complacent to wean off Google's easy and dirty money and now it might end really badly if they don't get alternative sources of revenue on very short notice. Regardless, the DOJ has decided that paying up other companies to make Google the default search engine is an unacceptable anti-competitive practice. Mozilla having to advocate for Google's right to continue to be able to do it and calling it a "revenue stream for independent browsers" is rather unfortunate and it only further reinforces that "to fundamentally reexamine their entire operating model" is a necessity for yesteryear.