r/BlatantMisogyny • u/DumbedDownDinosaur • 4d ago
Misogyny Merry Christmas to everyone, I guess.
/r/GenZ/comments/1hlsfb5/gen_z_men_who_struggle_with_dating_dont_blame/25
u/joyfall 4d ago
A bunch of butt hurt incels with no friends or loved ones to talk to on Christmas eve circle jerking with their misogyny. I'm shocked.
Women shouldn't expect any sympathy from us either especially when it comes to elections.
They are happy that Trump won because fuck those women for not dating me.
11
u/DelightfulandDarling 3d ago
Can you even imagine being smug about women dying from lack of abortion care and still believing women should be attracted to you! I can’t even imagine what it would take to lack self awareness to that degree.
These are the men who should be taken out of the gene pool.
10
u/DelightfulandDarling 3d ago
Men don’t want relationships with those women. Men want to fuck those women. Just because men will stick their dicks in anything does not mean women are too selective.
Men are our only predator on this planet and they kill one of us every 11 minutes. If we aren’t selective we can die.
Men aren’t lonely they’re horny and they’ll survive a case of dry balls.
5
u/TerryFalcone 3d ago
Good god, I’m happy that I didn’t turn out like those sad sacks in the comments as a Gen Z man
1
u/verysadsadgirl 22h ago
This guy talks about empirical evidence and then fully makes up numbers with no backing lollllll
21
u/alexia_not_alexa 4d ago
I clicked on the link about 'nicer' men are less favoured hoping it's a study. Nope, it's an article that references the supposed study with no links to it at all to them, just what the studies concluded. Funny that... I'm sure they're not hiding anything to push an agenda at all...
So I clicked on the first link, which literally has arguments that OP ignored - "a feedback loop of opposing men seeking quantity of offsprings vs women seeking quality of offsprings" - probably because it puts men in a poor light.
Let's click on the second link: Oh what's that? The study made no mention of the 'bottom 80%' at all? So OP just pulled the decrease in sexual partners out of their ass then? Because as we all know, sex is a zero sum's game - someone else having more sex means I'm having less...
Next link about bullying, the conclusion OP drew came from the section about bullying being an adaptive behaviour, and only theorised 'mating success' for bullies without actual studies on it. The section that ACTUALLY studied literally said: "Nevertheless, results from Arnocky and Vaillancourt’s study raises some doubt about the link between bullying and reproductive success given that self-identified bullies did not report higher dating levels."
The dark trait study linked asked women to rate fictional / created men with dark traits - i.e. not their actual choice in partners. My wife's favourite character in Arcane is Silco ffs... she's an Astarian sim, and she would run for the hills if these people exist in real life... I guess men can't fathom that we may fantasise about someone we wouldn't want to be with in real life? Do the guys who drool over Stellar Blade really want her in real life?!
And final study talks about Tinder, which was literally conceptualised as a hookup app in the first place that no doubt had a huge influence on HOW we approach online dating. On an app that prioritises and commodifies your looks first and foremost... literally what do you expect the outcome to be? It's like drawing conclusions about average diet habits by conducting a study in only Weight Watcher participants...
Well that was a fun little exercise, thanks for sharing.