Your support depends upon the number of sexual partners a person has had? Do you apply this arbitrary standard to men as well or is it a flexible standard? The two other podcasts with higher viewership are operated by knuckledragging troglodytes and nobody seems to care how they got so famous.
Please don't try to convert other people's words to your argumentative narrative. It's pretty clear they are insinuating the relief that this girl's personality isn't "sex" because that's nothing new.
They complimented her success on being a normal person and you can't just let that go? Why are you so hungry to argue with someone? No one brought up any X amount of sexual partners.
Promiscuous means having multiple sexual partners. He also called other women "whores" and said he was glad she wasn't one. People who talk like that generally aren't known for their respect for women
He didn't call anyone specific a whore. Nor did he generalize any amount of women are whores. He is describing the characteristics of someone he's not interested in giving attention to. In response to a question YOU asked.
The general consensus is that we're praising this girl for her ambition and being a seemingly average person despite being thrown into fame.
Why are you arguing like that's not good enough? We're on the same side and we're trying to be rational, but it seems like all you want to do is bash men for voicing an opinion.
All I was asking was, are his standards universal or only applied to women? Does he stop watching male entertainers who are known to be promiscuous? Probably not and it matters because anyone who uses a woman's amount of prior sexual partners as a way to gage how much respect they should have for her is shallow as fuck and their opinion is useless. Asking how many sexual partners a person has had is really just putting your own insecurities on display for everyone to see.
Didn't he say he supports her because she's promiscuous?
Also why are you more offended at his use of "promiscuous" than "low IQ"?
Lol we're living in a world where dumbos like yourself get more triggered by perceived "slut shaming" (of a girl famous LITERALLY for talking about blow jobs nonetheless...) than you do about people insulting the IQ of others ...
You literally hopped on different comments I made in other threads when you lurked through my profile. You're obviously triggered. That's so pathetic. Lol
I know the word "projection" has entered the zeitgeist relatively recently but I don't think you know what it means. Calling out someone's insecurities and shallow behavior doesn't come from a place of insecurity, it comes from a place of disgust. I hope that helps.
2
u/-Miss-Anne-Thrope- Oct 01 '24
Your support depends upon the number of sexual partners a person has had? Do you apply this arbitrary standard to men as well or is it a flexible standard? The two other podcasts with higher viewership are operated by knuckledragging troglodytes and nobody seems to care how they got so famous.