Your support depends upon the number of sexual partners a person has had? Do you apply this arbitrary standard to men as well or is it a flexible standard? The two other podcasts with higher viewership are operated by knuckledragging troglodytes and nobody seems to care how they got so famous.
Seriously, what are these freaks in this thread. The 'femanist' who's looking for a fight seems to frequent TJRE sub, so I'm guessing they have nothing better to do with their life than cry about being persecuted.
You respond to a direct question and it gets copied over like it was a direct comment to something above, with no context....
I'd give this fight up. Was worth a try, but these people just want to be angry at someone.
Simple. They're people who will defend women, however nasty, worthless, horrible human beings they are, or the idiotic entitled shit that they're staining humanity with, just because they're women. That is the most important thing in their mind instead of what they represent and do.
I have a lot of respect for actual feminists but these are not that. This is a bitter, misandristic, feminazi bunch that actually discriminates against people for being male. And yet, they have the audacity to attempt to lecture people on anything.
Therefore, you're completely right. It's absolutely not worth it.
I have a lot of respect for actual feminists but these are not that. This is a bitter, misandristic, feminazi bunch that actually discriminates against people for being male. And yet, they have the audacity to attempt to lecture people on anything.
You never answered my question on whether or not your dumbass standard is universal because you and I both know the answer. Anyone who uses words like "feminazi" or "misandristic" are surely supporters of women, right? What a joke. You gauge your respect for a woman based on how many people they've had sex with. You're a shallow ape afraid of being compared to other men because you are insecure. You only "supported" her when you found out she wasn't promiscuous. It says a lot.
Okay. Hey everyone. If you want to see a conversation where two people build a strawman of the worst version of who they perceive the other to be so they can receive the dopamine boost of arguing with a perceived flawed person, read their entire conversation.
I just figured most would read between the lines, but I gotchu!
You're both likely normal reasonable people. But you both refused to see it through the caricatures you've each drawn up. I should have said "you're both being lame" I'm sorry for the original words I chose, it wasn't very thoughtful.
And here you are, hours after the fact, feigning superiority over two people so you can feel a little better about yourself. At least he and I were arguing about something relevant to the conversation. You, on the other hand, contributed nothing at all besides an upturned nose. Get over yourself. Also, my "strawman" was enough to get him to convey his true feelings regarding women, which is exactly what I was implying/suspecting with my original question.
I just felt sad mostly. People who use whore to describe a woman or knuckledragger to describe a man, or whatever. Are just kinda misled or hurting somehow. Just harmful tropes that make everybody else feel tired. I didn't feel better, and I just feel worse now after your response was way different than I'd expected.
I really don't care what you think, or do I have a shred of intention of explaining myself to you about anything. What I did was politely ask you to take your strawmanny arguments to another comment and continue your Don Quixotesque fight there. I have no intention of entertaining you further on.
however nasty, worthless, horrible human beings they are, or the idiotic entitled shit that they're staining humanity with, just because they're women.
Are these "nasty, worthless, horrible" women in the room with us right now?
You’re doing that strawman thing you’re accusing the other guy of doing again. It’s okay to be wrong on the internet dude. The fact you are incapable of rereading this conversation and seeing nothing wrong with it on your end says a lot about who you are.
They don’t have to be a feminazi and you don’t have to be an incel, but maybe they have a point about your double standard with a lady having multiple partners being a little shitty. Jesus Christ everyone has gone crazy.
2
u/-Miss-Anne-Thrope- Oct 01 '24
Your support depends upon the number of sexual partners a person has had? Do you apply this arbitrary standard to men as well or is it a flexible standard? The two other podcasts with higher viewership are operated by knuckledragging troglodytes and nobody seems to care how they got so famous.