r/woahthatsinteresting Oct 01 '24

I'm glad she is growing but how is this even possible?

Post image
25.0k Upvotes

5.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '24

A low IQ promiscuous, attention-hungry girl. She used her 5 minutes of fame to create something interesting, from what people are talking about. So, I support her.

2

u/-Miss-Anne-Thrope- Oct 01 '24

Your support depends upon the number of sexual partners a person has had? Do you apply this arbitrary standard to men as well or is it a flexible standard? The two other podcasts with higher viewership are operated by knuckledragging troglodytes and nobody seems to care how they got so famous.

-1

u/donegalboy Oct 01 '24

Who mentioned sexual partners?

0

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '24

I was actually praising Hailey, but apparently, the Mrs here wanted to pick a fight.

1

u/VexingRaven Oct 01 '24

If you can't praise somebody without attacking others in the process, that's a really bad look.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '24

Hey, I pointed out that I'm pleasantly surprised that a podcaster is different, and it suddenly turned into the Spanish inquisition because a lady felt like fighting since "women" were being "attacked." They weren't. My opinion on them is what I've said that it is, and no, you're not going to change it. In fact, I have zero respect for their "values" and expectations, and no, I'm not going to respect them just because they're women. I'm more interested in what kind of human beings they are. Hope I made it clear.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '24

No, no. Bring out that comment you made, and we can talk about your crusade against imaginary incels, who got stuck on whose comment, and who's the really insufferable one.

Just continue on the warpath, you paladin, you! You'll certainly change opinions in a well-argumented manner as you usually do.

1

u/VexingRaven Oct 01 '24

What else do you want me to call somebody who just started ranting unprompted about low-IQ whores?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '24

Read that comment again. I was praising her for being different. But hey, I apologize for pointing it out by describing "the others" when I WAS ASKED TO.

1

u/Wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwtt Oct 02 '24

He was literally prompted lmao

1

u/VexingRaven Oct 02 '24

Not really. He left this thread just begging to pulled:

instead of... you know.

Somebody pulled it, and misogyny immediately spewed out.

1

u/DisposableDroid47 Oct 01 '24

Seriously, what are these freaks in this thread. The 'femanist' who's looking for a fight seems to frequent TJRE sub, so I'm guessing they have nothing better to do with their life than cry about being persecuted.

You respond to a direct question and it gets copied over like it was a direct comment to something above, with no context....

I'd give this fight up. Was worth a try, but these people just want to be angry at someone.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '24

Simple. They're people who will defend women, however nasty, worthless, horrible human beings they are, or the idiotic entitled shit that they're staining humanity with, just because they're women. That is the most important thing in their mind instead of what they represent and do.

I have a lot of respect for actual feminists but these are not that. This is a bitter, misandristic, feminazi bunch that actually discriminates against people for being male. And yet, they have the audacity to attempt to lecture people on anything.

Therefore, you're completely right. It's absolutely not worth it.

1

u/-Miss-Anne-Thrope- Oct 02 '24 edited Oct 02 '24

I have a lot of respect for actual feminists but these are not that. This is a bitter, misandristic, feminazi bunch that actually discriminates against people for being male. And yet, they have the audacity to attempt to lecture people on anything.

You never answered my question on whether or not your dumbass standard is universal because you and I both know the answer. Anyone who uses words like "feminazi" or "misandristic" are surely supporters of women, right? What a joke. You gauge your respect for a woman based on how many people they've had sex with. You're a shallow ape afraid of being compared to other men because you are insecure. You only "supported" her when you found out she wasn't promiscuous. It says a lot.

0

u/dedom19 Oct 02 '24

You're both pretty lame.

1

u/-Miss-Anne-Thrope- Oct 03 '24

Thanks for adding nothing of value to the conversation.

1

u/dedom19 Oct 03 '24 edited Oct 03 '24

Okay. Hey everyone. If you want to see a conversation where two people build a strawman of the worst version of who they perceive the other to be so they can receive the dopamine boost of arguing with a perceived flawed person, read their entire conversation.

I just figured most would read between the lines, but I gotchu!

You're both likely normal reasonable people. But you both refused to see it through the caricatures you've each drawn up. I should have said "you're both being lame" I'm sorry for the original words I chose, it wasn't very thoughtful.

1

u/-Miss-Anne-Thrope- Oct 03 '24

And here you are, hours after the fact, feigning superiority over two people so you can feel a little better about yourself. At least he and I were arguing about something relevant to the conversation. You, on the other hand, contributed nothing at all besides an upturned nose. Get over yourself. Also, my "strawman" was enough to get him to convey his true feelings regarding women, which is exactly what I was implying/suspecting with my original question.

1

u/dedom19 Oct 03 '24

I just felt sad mostly. People who use whore to describe a woman or knuckledragger to describe a man, or whatever. Are just kinda misled or hurting somehow. Just harmful tropes that make everybody else feel tired. I didn't feel better, and I just feel worse now after your response was way different than I'd expected.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '24

I really don't care what you think, or do I have a shred of intention of explaining myself to you about anything. What I did was politely ask you to take your strawmanny arguments to another comment and continue your Don Quixotesque fight there. I have no intention of entertaining you further on.

3

u/VexingRaven Oct 02 '24

politely ask you to take your strawmanny arguments

You are literally strawmanning imaginary women to hate on.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '24

Reread the comments and see how silly you look right now. See who tried hard to start an argument, then come back to me.

1

u/VexingRaven Oct 02 '24

however nasty, worthless, horrible human beings they are, or the idiotic entitled shit that they're staining humanity with, just because they're women.

Are these "nasty, worthless, horrible" women in the room with us right now?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '24

Oh, no! Please forgive me! All women are wonderful and inspiring human beings!

2

u/GateTraditional805 Oct 02 '24

You’re doing that strawman thing you’re accusing the other guy of doing again. It’s okay to be wrong on the internet dude. The fact you are incapable of rereading this conversation and seeing nothing wrong with it on your end says a lot about who you are.

They don’t have to be a feminazi and you don’t have to be an incel, but maybe they have a point about your double standard with a lady having multiple partners being a little shitty. Jesus Christ everyone has gone crazy.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 02 '24

Lmao. Ditto. FYI, try to see who started all of this so you could touch grass.

2

u/GateTraditional805 Oct 02 '24

You’re fucking goofy dude, some else here nailed it. Get some sleep.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/chef_wizard Oct 02 '24

Forreally though touch grass and go to bed